1. The mutual relationship is expressed through both the conditional statement and its converse: Proposition: If a number is divisible by 3, then the sum of its digits is a multiple of 3. Converse: If the sum of the digits of a number is a multiple of 3, then the number is divisible by 3. Both statemenRead more

    The mutual relationship is expressed through both the conditional statement and its converse: Proposition: If a number is divisible by 3, then the sum of its digits is a multiple of 3. Converse: If the sum of the digits of a number is a multiple of 3, then the number is divisible by 3. Both statements are mathematically true and form a biconditional equivalence.

     

    For more NCERT Solutions of Class 9 Maths Ganita Manjari Part 2 Chapter 9 Propositions and their Converses Question Answer (2026-27)

    https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/maths/ganita-manjari-chapter-9/

    See less
    • 63
  2. Counterexamples disprove both statements: For (i), take the prime n = 11. Then 2¹¹ − 1 = 2048 − 1 = 2047, which factors as 23 × 89, making it composite. For (ii), take the even integer n = 6. Then 2⁶ + 1 = 64 + 1 = 65, which factors as 5 × 13, confirming it is not a prime number.   For more NCERead more

    Counterexamples disprove both statements:

    For (i), take the prime n = 11. Then 2¹¹ − 1 = 2048 − 1 = 2047, which factors as 23 × 89, making it composite.

    For (ii), take the even integer n = 6. Then 2⁶ + 1 = 64 + 1 = 65, which factors as 5 × 13, confirming it is not a prime number.

     

    For more NCERT Solutions of Class 9 Maths Ganita Manjari Part 2 Chapter 9 Propositions and their Converses Question Answer (2026-27)

    https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/maths/ganita-manjari-chapter-9/

    See less
    • 53
  3. (i) The statement is true because any multiple of 8 can be written as 8k = 2(4k) = 4(2k), meaning 2 and 4 are factors of 8. (ii) No, checking divisibility by 2 and 4 is not sufficient for 8 because 2 and 4 are not coprime. For example, 12 and 20 are divisible by both 2 and 4, but neither is divisiblRead more

    (i) The statement is true because any multiple of 8 can be written as 8k = 2(4k) = 4(2k), meaning 2 and 4 are factors of 8.

    (ii) No, checking divisibility by 2 and 4 is not sufficient for 8 because 2 and 4 are not coprime. For example, 12 and 20 are divisible by both 2 and 4, but neither is divisible by 8.

     

    For more NCERT Solutions of Class 9 Maths Ganita Manjari Part 2 Chapter 9 Propositions and their Converses Question Answer (2026-27)

    https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/maths/ganita-manjari-chapter-9/

    See less
    • 56
  4. Each claim is proven false by counterexamples: For (i), let n = 4; then 4(4)² + 1 = 65, which is composite (5 × 13). For (ii), let n = 10 or 11; taking n = 10 yields 10² + 10 + 11 = 121 = 11², a composite number. For (iii), let n = 4; then 4⁴ + 3 = 256 + 3 = 259 = 7 × 37, which is composite.  Read more

    Each claim is proven false by counterexamples:

    For (i), let n = 4; then 4(4)² + 1 = 65, which is composite (5 × 13).

    For (ii), let n = 10 or 11; taking n = 10 yields 10² + 10 + 11 = 121 = 11², a composite number.

    For (iii), let n = 4; then 4⁴ + 3 = 256 + 3 = 259 = 7 × 37, which is composite.

     

    For more NCERT Solutions of Class 9 Maths Ganita Manjari Part 2 Chapter 9 Propositions and their Converses Question Answer (2026-27)

    https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/maths/ganita-manjari-chapter-9/

    See less
    • 57
  5. (i) Weighting each friend's average by their sample count (Yusuf: 6, Srikanth: 4, Kashvi: 5, Prasanna: 4, Gracy: 4; total: 23) gives the combined average expression: [(6aᵧ) + (4aₛ) + (5aₖ) + (4aₚ) + (4a₉)] / 23. (ii) Counting items by type gives 13 nylon and 10 feather shuttles, producing the expresRead more

    (i) Weighting each friend’s average by their sample count (Yusuf: 6, Srikanth: 4, Kashvi: 5, Prasanna: 4, Gracy: 4; total: 23) gives the combined average expression: [(6aᵧ) + (4aₛ) + (5aₖ) + (4aₚ) + (4a₉)] / 23.

    (ii) Counting items by type gives 13 nylon and 10 feather shuttles, producing the expression [(13aₙ) + (10a𝒻)] / 23. Yes, this value equals the previous method because both represent the identical total cost divided by 23.

     

    For more NCERT Solutions of Class 9 Maths Ganita Manjari Part 2 Chapter 10 How Quantities Combine Understanding Data Question Answer (2026-27)

    https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/maths/ganita-manjari-chapter-10/

    See less
    • 61