Importance of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for access to justice: 1. Inclusivity: Allows any individual or group, regardless of financial status, to approach courts on behalf of public interest. 2. Broadened Scope: Addresses issues affecting the public at large, such as environment, human rightsRead more
Importance of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for access to justice:
1. Inclusivity: Allows any individual or group, regardless of financial status, to approach courts on behalf of public interest.
2. Broadened Scope: Addresses issues affecting the public at large, such as environment, human rights, and corruption.
3. Empowerment: Gives voice to marginalized groups, ensuring their grievances are heard for social justice.
4. Judicial Activism: Enables courts to proactively intervene to protect citizens’ rights.
5. Accountability: Holds authorities accountable, promoting transparency and fairness in governance.
PIL significantly enhances access to justice, making the legal system more inclusive, responsive, and accountable to societal concerns.
(a) Nigeria: Adopting India's Election Commission practices could help. Implement stringent technology-driven voting systems like India's EVMs, ensuring transparency and preventing fraudulent vote alterations. Immediate investigation of irregularities and independent oversight, as in India, would enRead more
(a) Nigeria: Adopting India’s Election Commission practices could help. Implement stringent technology-driven voting systems like India’s EVMs, ensuring transparency and preventing fraudulent vote alterations. Immediate investigation of irregularities and independent oversight, as in India, would enhance credibility.
(b) Fiji: Follow India’s Model Code of Conduct to prohibit voter intimidation and threats. Implement educational campaigns to promote tolerance and discourage fear tactics during elections.
(c) United States: Aim for uniformity in election procedures across states, like India’s nationwide guidelines. Establish a centralized election authority akin to India’s Election Commission for consistent oversight and quick resolution of disputes.
(a) Problem: Offering financial aid for reopening a closed sugar mill during elections could be viewed as an attempt to influence voters through inducement. Solution: The Election Commission should strictly enforce the Model Code of Conduct, penalizing such promises that violate the code. MonitoringRead more
(a) Problem: Offering financial aid for reopening a closed sugar mill during elections could be viewed as an attempt to influence voters through inducement.
Solution: The Election Commission should strictly enforce the Model Code of Conduct, penalizing such promises that violate the code. Monitoring and ensuring transparency in campaign promises, with severe consequences for those violating ethical standards, would deter such practices.
(b) Problem: Allegations of biased coverage in state-run media like Doordarshan and All India Radio, favoring specific parties, compromise fair representation.
Solution: Implementing impartial guidelines to ensure equitable coverage for all parties in state-run media. Establishing an independent body to monitor and enforce fair media coverage during elections would prevent biased representation.
(c) Problem: Presence of 20 lakh fake voters in the electoral rolls undermines the integrity of the voting process.
Solution: Conducting regular and thorough verification drives, employing technology like biometrics or Aadhaar linkage to eliminate fake voters. Strengthening verification processes through data analytics and robust identification mechanisms can rectify this issue.
(d) Problem: Political hooliganism, armed intimidation, and obstruction of rival party supporters disrupt the democratic process.
Solution: Stringent law enforcement to prevent armed movements, ensuring safety for all supporters. Immediate legal action against those engaging in violence, guaranteeing security for fair campaigning, and penalizing any breaches of the law during elections are imperative.
Ramesh, the statement suggesting "Women always vote as directed by men, so why grant them voting rights?" is incorrect. It unfairly assumes women lack independent opinions in voting. Democracy ensures equal rights for all, irrespective of gender. Disregarding women's voting rights based on stereotypRead more
Ramesh, the statement suggesting “Women always vote as directed by men, so why grant them voting rights?” is incorrect. It unfairly assumes women lack independent opinions in voting. Democracy ensures equal rights for all, irrespective of gender. Disregarding women’s voting rights based on stereotypes undermines the essence of democracy. Women, like men, possess diverse opinions and should have the same opportunity to participate in the democratic process, making informed and independent choices.
Ramesh, the statement suggesting "Elections should be based on consensus, not competition due to tensions caused by party politics," has limitations. While consensus is desirable, competition among parties is fundamental in democracy. It ensures representation of diverse views and fosters accountabiRead more
Ramesh, the statement suggesting “Elections should be based on consensus, not competition due to tensions caused by party politics,” has limitations. While consensus is desirable, competition among parties is fundamental in democracy. It ensures representation of diverse views and fosters accountability. Competition encourages debates, transparency, and choice among citizens, vital for a healthy democratic process. It’s not party politics itself but the manner in which it operates that determines its impact on societal harmony.
Why do you think the introduction of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) in the 1980s is a significant step in ensuring access to justice for all?
Importance of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for access to justice: 1. Inclusivity: Allows any individual or group, regardless of financial status, to approach courts on behalf of public interest. 2. Broadened Scope: Addresses issues affecting the public at large, such as environment, human rightsRead more
Importance of Public Interest Litigation (PIL) for access to justice:
1. Inclusivity: Allows any individual or group, regardless of financial status, to approach courts on behalf of public interest.
2. Broadened Scope: Addresses issues affecting the public at large, such as environment, human rights, and corruption.
3. Empowerment: Gives voice to marginalized groups, ensuring their grievances are heard for social justice.
4. Judicial Activism: Enables courts to proactively intervene to protect citizens’ rights.
5. Accountability: Holds authorities accountable, promoting transparency and fairness in governance.
PIL significantly enhances access to justice, making the legal system more inclusive, responsive, and accountable to societal concerns.
See lessHere are some reports of electoral malpractices from different parts of the world. Is there anything that these countries can learn from India to improve their elections? What would you suggest in each case? (a) During an election in Nigeria, the officer in-charge of counting votes deliberately increased the votes of one candidate and declared him elected. The court later found out that more than five lakh votes cast for one candidate were counted in favour of another. (b) Just before elections in Fiji, a pamphlet was distributed warning voters that a vote for former Prime Minister Mahendra Chaudhry will lead to bloodshed. This was a threat to voters of Indian origin. (c) In the US, each state has its own method of voting its own procedure of counting and its own authority for conducting elections. Authorities in the state of Florida took many controversial decisions that-favoured Mr Bush in the presidential elections in 2000. But no one could change those decisions.
(a) Nigeria: Adopting India's Election Commission practices could help. Implement stringent technology-driven voting systems like India's EVMs, ensuring transparency and preventing fraudulent vote alterations. Immediate investigation of irregularities and independent oversight, as in India, would enRead more
(a) Nigeria: Adopting India’s Election Commission practices could help. Implement stringent technology-driven voting systems like India’s EVMs, ensuring transparency and preventing fraudulent vote alterations. Immediate investigation of irregularities and independent oversight, as in India, would enhance credibility.
(b) Fiji: Follow India’s Model Code of Conduct to prohibit voter intimidation and threats. Implement educational campaigns to promote tolerance and discourage fear tactics during elections.
(c) United States: Aim for uniformity in election procedures across states, like India’s nationwide guidelines. Establish a centralized election authority akin to India’s Election Commission for consistent oversight and quick resolution of disputes.
See lessHere are some reports of malpractices in Indian elections. Identify, what the problem in each case is. what should be done to correct the situation? (a) Following the announcement of elections, the minister promised. to provide financial aid to reopen the closed sugar mill. (b) Opposition parties alleged that their statements and campaign was not given due attention in Doordarshan and All India Radio. (c) An enquiry by the Election Commission showed that electoral rolls of a state contain name of 20 lakh fake voters. (d) The hoodlums of a political party were moving with guns, physically pre- venting supporters of other political parties to meet the voters and attacking meetings of other parties.
(a) Problem: Offering financial aid for reopening a closed sugar mill during elections could be viewed as an attempt to influence voters through inducement. Solution: The Election Commission should strictly enforce the Model Code of Conduct, penalizing such promises that violate the code. MonitoringRead more
(a) Problem: Offering financial aid for reopening a closed sugar mill during elections could be viewed as an attempt to influence voters through inducement.
Solution: The Election Commission should strictly enforce the Model Code of Conduct, penalizing such promises that violate the code. Monitoring and ensuring transparency in campaign promises, with severe consequences for those violating ethical standards, would deter such practices.
(b) Problem: Allegations of biased coverage in state-run media like Doordarshan and All India Radio, favoring specific parties, compromise fair representation.
Solution: Implementing impartial guidelines to ensure equitable coverage for all parties in state-run media. Establishing an independent body to monitor and enforce fair media coverage during elections would prevent biased representation.
(c) Problem: Presence of 20 lakh fake voters in the electoral rolls undermines the integrity of the voting process.
Solution: Conducting regular and thorough verification drives, employing technology like biometrics or Aadhaar linkage to eliminate fake voters. Strengthening verification processes through data analytics and robust identification mechanisms can rectify this issue.
(d) Problem: Political hooliganism, armed intimidation, and obstruction of rival party supporters disrupt the democratic process.
See lessSolution: Stringent law enforcement to prevent armed movements, ensuring safety for all supporters. Immediate legal action against those engaging in violence, guaranteeing security for fair campaigning, and penalizing any breaches of the law during elections are imperative.
Ramesh was not in class when this chapter was being taught. He came the next day and reported what he had heard from his father. Can you tell Ramesh what is wrong with these statement Women always vote the way men tell them. So what is the point of giving them the right to vote?
Ramesh, the statement suggesting "Women always vote as directed by men, so why grant them voting rights?" is incorrect. It unfairly assumes women lack independent opinions in voting. Democracy ensures equal rights for all, irrespective of gender. Disregarding women's voting rights based on stereotypRead more
Ramesh, the statement suggesting “Women always vote as directed by men, so why grant them voting rights?” is incorrect. It unfairly assumes women lack independent opinions in voting. Democracy ensures equal rights for all, irrespective of gender. Disregarding women’s voting rights based on stereotypes undermines the essence of democracy. Women, like men, possess diverse opinions and should have the same opportunity to participate in the democratic process, making informed and independent choices.
See lessRamesh was not in class when this chapter was being taught. He came the next day and reported what he had heard from his father. Can you tell Ramesh what is wrong with these statement Party politics creates tension in society. Elections should be decided by consensus not by competition.
Ramesh, the statement suggesting "Elections should be based on consensus, not competition due to tensions caused by party politics," has limitations. While consensus is desirable, competition among parties is fundamental in democracy. It ensures representation of diverse views and fosters accountabiRead more
Ramesh, the statement suggesting “Elections should be based on consensus, not competition due to tensions caused by party politics,” has limitations. While consensus is desirable, competition among parties is fundamental in democracy. It ensures representation of diverse views and fosters accountability. Competition encourages debates, transparency, and choice among citizens, vital for a healthy democratic process. It’s not party politics itself but the manner in which it operates that determines its impact on societal harmony.
See less