I agree with Ouseph's conclusion that every society needs some form of power sharing, regardless of its size or social divisions. Power sharing isn't exclusive to divided societies. It's crucial for preventing tyranny, promoting inclusivity, and ensuring stability by accommodating diverse perspectivRead more
I agree with Ouseph’s conclusion that every society needs some form of power sharing, regardless of its size or social divisions. Power sharing isn’t exclusive to divided societies. It’s crucial for preventing tyranny, promoting inclusivity, and ensuring stability by accommodating diverse perspectives, even in homogeneous or small societies, thereby fostering a sense of participation and unity among all its members.
No, the ban on speaking French in schools goes against Belgium's power-sharing arrangements. Belgium practices community-based power sharing to accommodate linguistic diversity. Such a ban undermines the principle of linguistic rights and inclusivity, contradicting the spirit of power sharing aimedRead more
No, the ban on speaking French in schools goes against Belgium’s power-sharing arrangements. Belgium practices community-based power sharing to accommodate linguistic diversity. Such a ban undermines the principle of linguistic rights and inclusivity, contradicting the spirit of power sharing aimed at respecting and representing diverse linguistic groups within the country.
One of the prudential reasons for power sharing in the context of the passage is to reduce corruption and enhance administrative efficiency. By empowering the panchayats and involving people in the planning and implementation of developmental schemes, it minimizes the role of corrupt intermediaries,Read more
One of the prudential reasons for power sharing in the context of the passage is to reduce corruption and enhance administrative efficiency. By empowering the panchayats and involving people in the planning and implementation of developmental schemes, it minimizes the role of corrupt intermediaries, ensuring better control and transparency in governance, thereby strengthening the foundations of democracy.
Similar Feature: Both India and Belgium practice federalism with a bicameral legislature at the national level. In India, the Parliament consists of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, similar to Belgium's Federal Parliament, comprising the Chamber of Representatives and the Senate. Different Feature: InRead more
Similar Feature:
Both India and Belgium practice federalism with a bicameral legislature at the national level. In India, the Parliament consists of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, similar to Belgium’s Federal Parliament, comprising the Chamber of Representatives and the Senate.
Different Feature:
India follows a quasi-federal structure, where the states’ powers are not absolute, and the central government can alter state boundaries. In contrast, Belgium practices true federalism, with states having more autonomy, and altering boundaries requires consent from all concerned regions.
In a federal form of government: - Power Distribution: Powers are divided between the central (national) government and regional (state/provincial) governments. - Regional Autonomy: States have their laws and some autonomy in specific areas. - Example: India practices federalism; states have powersRead more
In a federal form of government:
– Power Distribution: Powers are divided between the central (national) government and regional (state/provincial) governments.
– Regional Autonomy: States have their laws and some autonomy in specific areas.
– Example: India practices federalism; states have powers over education, healthcare, and other areas within their jurisdictions.
In a unitary form of government:
– Centralized Power: All powers are held by the central (national) government.
– No Regional Autonomy: Local governments operate under the authority of the central government.
– Example: France operates as a unitary state, with power concentrated at the national level without significant regional autonomy.
After reading this chapter, three students drew different conclusions. Which of these do you agree with and why? Give your reasons in about 50 words. Thomman − Power sharing is necessary only in societies which have religious, linguistic or ethnic divisions. Mathayi − Power sharing is suitable only for big countries that have regional divisons. Ouseph − Every society needs some form of power sharing even if it is small or does not have social divisions.
I agree with Ouseph's conclusion that every society needs some form of power sharing, regardless of its size or social divisions. Power sharing isn't exclusive to divided societies. It's crucial for preventing tyranny, promoting inclusivity, and ensuring stability by accommodating diverse perspectivRead more
I agree with Ouseph’s conclusion that every society needs some form of power sharing, regardless of its size or social divisions. Power sharing isn’t exclusive to divided societies. It’s crucial for preventing tyranny, promoting inclusivity, and ensuring stability by accommodating diverse perspectives, even in homogeneous or small societies, thereby fostering a sense of participation and unity among all its members.
See lessThe Mayor of Merchtem, a town near Brussels in Belgium, has defended a ban on speaking French in the town’s schools. He said that the ban would help all non-Dutch speakers integrate in this Flemish town. Do you think that this measure is in keeping with the spirit of Belgium’s power sharing arrangements? Give your reasons in about 50 words.
No, the ban on speaking French in schools goes against Belgium's power-sharing arrangements. Belgium practices community-based power sharing to accommodate linguistic diversity. Such a ban undermines the principle of linguistic rights and inclusivity, contradicting the spirit of power sharing aimedRead more
No, the ban on speaking French in schools goes against Belgium’s power-sharing arrangements. Belgium practices community-based power sharing to accommodate linguistic diversity. Such a ban undermines the principle of linguistic rights and inclusivity, contradicting the spirit of power sharing aimed at respecting and representing diverse linguistic groups within the country.
See lessRead the following passage and pick out any one of the prudential reasons for power sharing offered in this. “We need to give more power to the panchayats to realise the dream of Mahatma Gandhi and the hopes of the makers of our Constitution. Panchayati Raj establishes true democracy. It restores power to the only place where power belongs in a democracy − in the hands of the people. Given power to panchayats is also a way to reduce corruption and increase administrative efficiency. When people participate in the planning and implementation of developmental schemes, they would naturally exercise greater control over these schemes. This would eliminate the corrupt middlemen. Thus, Panchayati Raj will strengthen the foundations of our democracy.”
One of the prudential reasons for power sharing in the context of the passage is to reduce corruption and enhance administrative efficiency. By empowering the panchayats and involving people in the planning and implementation of developmental schemes, it minimizes the role of corrupt intermediaries,Read more
One of the prudential reasons for power sharing in the context of the passage is to reduce corruption and enhance administrative efficiency. By empowering the panchayats and involving people in the planning and implementation of developmental schemes, it minimizes the role of corrupt intermediaries, ensuring better control and transparency in governance, thereby strengthening the foundations of democracy.
See lessPoint out one feature in the practice of federalism in India that is similar to and one feature that is different from that of Belgium.
Similar Feature: Both India and Belgium practice federalism with a bicameral legislature at the national level. In India, the Parliament consists of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, similar to Belgium's Federal Parliament, comprising the Chamber of Representatives and the Senate. Different Feature: InRead more
Similar Feature:
Both India and Belgium practice federalism with a bicameral legislature at the national level. In India, the Parliament consists of the Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha, similar to Belgium’s Federal Parliament, comprising the Chamber of Representatives and the Senate.
Different Feature:
See lessIndia follows a quasi-federal structure, where the states’ powers are not absolute, and the central government can alter state boundaries. In contrast, Belgium practices true federalism, with states having more autonomy, and altering boundaries requires consent from all concerned regions.
What is the main difference between a federal form of government and a unitary one? Explain with an example.
In a federal form of government: - Power Distribution: Powers are divided between the central (national) government and regional (state/provincial) governments. - Regional Autonomy: States have their laws and some autonomy in specific areas. - Example: India practices federalism; states have powersRead more
In a federal form of government:
– Power Distribution: Powers are divided between the central (national) government and regional (state/provincial) governments.
– Regional Autonomy: States have their laws and some autonomy in specific areas.
– Example: India practices federalism; states have powers over education, healthcare, and other areas within their jurisdictions.
In a unitary form of government:
See less– Centralized Power: All powers are held by the central (national) government.
– No Regional Autonomy: Local governments operate under the authority of the central government.
– Example: France operates as a unitary state, with power concentrated at the national level without significant regional autonomy.