Share & grow the world's knowledge!
We want to connect the people who have knowledge to the people who need it, to bring together people with different perspectives so they can understand each other better, and to empower everyone to share their knowledge.
Which of the following causes were responsible for the decline of the Delhi Sultanate? 1. Weak administration 2. Timur’s invasion 3. Lack of a clear policy of annexation 4. Rise of a composite culture
The decline of the Delhi Sultanate resulted from administrative weaknesses, political fragmentation and external invasions. Later rulers lacked the strength and capability of early Sultans, allowing nobles to become powerful and rebellious. Timur’s brutal invasion in 1398 devastated Delhi’s economy,Read more
The decline of the Delhi Sultanate resulted from administrative weaknesses, political fragmentation and external invasions. Later rulers lacked the strength and capability of early Sultans, allowing nobles to become powerful and rebellious. Timur’s brutal invasion in 1398 devastated Delhi’s economy, population and military structure. The Sultanate also lacked a consistent policy of territorial expansion or proper succession rules, leading to instability. Meanwhile, the growth of composite culture—Hindi-Persian linguistic and cultural fusion—was a positive development and not a cause of political decline. Therefore, weak governance, Timur’s invasion and unclear expansion policies were the main factors.
See lessWhich of the following was the second Turkish invasion of India? (A) Mahmud Ghaznavi (B) Muhammad Ghori (C) Genghis Khan (D) Timur Lang
Muhammad Ghori is considered responsible for the second major Turkish invasion of India. The first significant Turkish invader was Mahmud Ghaznavi, who conducted multiple raids primarily for plunder. Many decades later, Muhammad Ghori launched the next wave of Turkish expansion by systematically attRead more
Muhammad Ghori is considered responsible for the second major Turkish invasion of India. The first significant Turkish invader was Mahmud Ghaznavi, who conducted multiple raids primarily for plunder. Many decades later, Muhammad Ghori launched the next wave of Turkish expansion by systematically attacking North Indian kingdoms, including those ruled by the Chauhans and the Gahadavalas. His aim was not just plunder but permanent political conquest. After his victory in the Second Battle of Tarain (1192 CE), Ghori established firm control, paving the way for his generals to create the Delhi Sultanate. Therefore, option (B) correctly identifies the second Turkish invader.
See lessMuhammad Ghori belonged to which dynasty?
Muhammad Ghori, also known as Muhammad bin Sam, came from the Shansbani or Ghurid dynasty, which controlled the mountainous region of Ghor in present-day Afghanistan. This dynasty emerged as a strong power after defeating the Ghaznavids. Ghori expanded eastward and launched successive campaigns intoRead more
Muhammad Ghori, also known as Muhammad bin Sam, came from the Shansbani or Ghurid dynasty, which controlled the mountainous region of Ghor in present-day Afghanistan. This dynasty emerged as a strong power after defeating the Ghaznavids. Ghori expanded eastward and launched successive campaigns into India, culminating in the decisive Second Battle of Tarain in 1192. His victories broke Rajput power and allowed his general Qutbuddin Aibak to lay the foundation of the Delhi Sultanate. Ghori belonged neither to the Yamini (Ghaznavid) dynasty nor to later dynasties like the Khiljis or Ghulams.
See lessMuhammad Ghori is also known by what other name?
Historical texts refer to Muhammad Ghori using multiple names. “Shahabuddin” was an honorific meaning “Star of the Faith.” “Muhammad bin Sam” identifies him by lineage, being the son of Sam. “Muizuddin” was another royal title signifying “Strengthener of the Faith.” Chroniclers and Persian historianRead more
Historical texts refer to Muhammad Ghori using multiple names. “Shahabuddin” was an honorific meaning “Star of the Faith.” “Muhammad bin Sam” identifies him by lineage, being the son of Sam. “Muizuddin” was another royal title signifying “Strengthener of the Faith.” Chroniclers and Persian historians used these names interchangeably depending on the context—military campaigns, royal decrees or dynastic listings. Since all titles correctly represent Muhammad Ghori, option (D) is accurate.
See lessAgainst which state did Muhammad Ghori launch his first attack on India in 1175 AD?
In 1175 CE, Muhammad Ghori started his expansion into India by launching his first attack on Multan, which was controlled by the Carmathian (Karmathi) sect. The region was strategically important due to its location on major trade routes and its proximity to the Indian plains. Ghori captured MultanRead more
In 1175 CE, Muhammad Ghori started his expansion into India by launching his first attack on Multan, which was controlled by the Carmathian (Karmathi) sect. The region was strategically important due to its location on major trade routes and its proximity to the Indian plains. Ghori captured Multan and subsequently advanced to Uch and Lahore, defeating the Ghaznavid rulers. This early success marked the beginning of his systematic penetration into North India, eventually leading to conflicts with Rajput powers like Prithviraj Chauhan. Thus, his first Indian target was Multan.
See less