Why did political leaders differ sharply over the question of separate electorates?

Political leaders held contrasting views on separate electorates due to diverse perspectives on representation, national unity, and communal harmony. Proponents of separate electorates advocated for minority rights, asserting that such measures were necessary to safeguard the interests of religious or ethnic groups within a diverse society. They believed this provision would ensure fair representation and protect the socio-political interests of marginalized communities.

However, opponents of separate electorates were concerned about fostering communal divisions, emphasizing the importance of a unified national identity transcending religious lines. They argued that such measures could perpetuate communal tensions, hindering the creation of a cohesive nation. Disagreements arose over the impact of separate electorates on political power distribution and the long-term societal implications, reflecting conflicting ideologies and concerns about social integration versus group representation.