1. (i) The new forest laws changed the lives of forest dwellers in yet another way. (ii) Before the forest laws, many people who lived in or near forests had survived by hunting deer, partridges and a variety of small animals. (iii) This customary practice was prohibited by the forest laws. Those who wRead more

    (i) The new forest laws changed the lives of forest dwellers in yet another way.
    (ii) Before the forest laws, many people who lived in or near forests had survived by hunting deer, partridges and a variety of small animals.
    (iii) This customary practice was prohibited by the forest laws. Those who were caught hunting were now punished for poaching

    See less
    • 2
  2. (i) British needed forests in order to build ships and railways. (ii) They were worried that the use of forests by local people and the reckless felling of trees by traders would destroy forests. (iii) So, they decided to invite a German expert, Dietrich Brandis, for advice and made him the first InRead more

    (i) British needed forests in order to build ships and railways.
    (ii) They were worried that the use of forests by local people and the reckless felling of trees by traders would destroy forests.
    (iii) So, they decided to invite a German expert, Dietrich Brandis, for advice and made him the first Inspector General of Forests in India.

    See less
    • 1
  3. (i) As early as the 1850s, in the Madras Presidency alone 35,000 trees were being cut annually for sleepers. (ii) The government gave out contracts to individuals to supply, the required quantities. (iii) These contractors began cutting trees indiscriminately. Forests around the railway tracks startRead more

    (i) As early as the 1850s, in the Madras Presidency alone 35,000 trees were being cut annually for sleepers.
    (ii) The government gave out contracts to individuals to supply, the required quantities.
    (iii) These contractors began cutting trees indiscriminately. Forests around the railway tracks started disappearing fast.

    See less
    • 2
  4. (i) In India, the forest department cut trees freely to meet British war needs. (ii) In Java, before the Japanese occupied the region, the Dutch followed 'a scorched Earth policy', by destroying sawmills and burning huge piles of teaks logs, so that it would not fall into the hands of Japanese. (iiiRead more

    (i) In India, the forest department cut trees freely to meet British war needs.
    (ii) In Java, before the Japanese occupied the region, the Dutch followed ‘a scorched Earth policy’, by destroying sawmills and burning huge piles of teaks logs, so that it would not fall into the hands of Japanese.
    (iii) The Japanese also exploited the forests recklessly for their own war’ industries and forced villagers to cut down forests.

    See less
    • 2
  5. (i) Surontiko Samin of a teak forest village began questioning state ownership of forests. (ii) He argued that the state had not created the wind, water, Earth and wood, so it could not own it. (iii) Soon, he organised a widespread movement with the support of his sons-in-law and other families in hRead more

    (i) Surontiko Samin of a teak forest village began questioning state ownership of forests.
    (ii) He argued that the state had not created the wind, water, Earth and wood, so it could not own it.
    (iii) Soon, he organised a widespread movement with the support of his sons-in-law and other families in his village.
    Some Saminists protested by lying down on their land when the Dutch came to survey it, while others refused to pay taxes or fines or perform labour.

    See less
    • 1