Share & grow the world's knowledge!
We want to connect the people who have knowledge to the people who need it, to bring together people with different perspectives so they can understand each other better, and to empower everyone to share their knowledge.
The strategic importance of Malwa for the Marathas lay mainly in its—
Geographically, Malwa sits atop the Vindhya and Satpura ranges, connecting the Deccan plateau with the Indo-Gangetic plains. For the Peshwas, Malwa was more than just a source of revenue; it was a tactical necessity. Controlling this region allowed the Marathas to intercept Mughal communications andRead more
Geographically, Malwa sits atop the Vindhya and Satpura ranges, connecting the Deccan plateau with the Indo-Gangetic plains. For the Peshwas, Malwa was more than just a source of revenue; it was a tactical necessity. Controlling this region allowed the Marathas to intercept Mughal communications and move troops rapidly between Pune and Delhi. Its fertile soil and wealthy trade routes also provided a stable economic base. Its conquest by Bajirao I was the decisive step that transformed the Maratha state from a southern kingdom into an all-India empire.
See lessWhich factor best explains why Maratha authority was more extractive than administrative in northern India?
The Maratha presence in the North was frequently challenged, making it difficult to establish a stable administrative framework like they had in the Deccan. Their primary objective was to secure "Chauth" to sustain their expensive military expeditions. Because their control over provinces like MalwaRead more
The Maratha presence in the North was frequently challenged, making it difficult to establish a stable administrative framework like they had in the Deccan. Their primary objective was to secure “Chauth” to sustain their expensive military expeditions. Because their control over provinces like Malwa and Rajasthan was often interrupted by invasions or internal revolts, they relied on local intermediaries and revenue farming. This extractive approach provided quick wealth but failed to win the “hearts and minds” of the local population. Consequently, the Marathas were often viewed as outsiders or raiders rather than legitimate successors to the Mughal administrative tradition.
See lessThe Maratha method of warfare was particularly effective in the Deccan because it—
The Maratha military success in the Deccan was deeply rooted in their ability to turn the environment into a weapon. Unlike the Mughals, who moved with heavy baggage trains and slow infantry, the Marathas traveled light and fast. This mobility allowed them to perform "hit-and-run" raids on Mughal caRead more
The Maratha military success in the Deccan was deeply rooted in their ability to turn the environment into a weapon. Unlike the Mughals, who moved with heavy baggage trains and slow infantry, the Marathas traveled light and fast. This mobility allowed them to perform “hit-and-run” raids on Mughal camps. The Sahyadri mountain ranges provided a natural defensive line with numerous hill forts. By exploiting these geographical features, the Marathas exhausted the resources and morale of invading imperial armies, proving that a smaller, more agile force could defeat a massive conventional empire.
See lessWhich factor most limited Maratha success against the British despite earlier victories over Mughals?
The British success was largely a result of Maratha political fragmentation. After the death of Nana Fadnavis, the "glue" that held the confederacy together dissolved. Unlike the conflict with the Mughals, where a common religious and cultural identity provided a degree of cohesion, the struggle agaRead more
The British success was largely a result of Maratha political fragmentation. After the death of Nana Fadnavis, the “glue” that held the confederacy together dissolved. Unlike the conflict with the Mughals, where a common religious and cultural identity provided a degree of cohesion, the struggle against the British saw Maratha sardars prioritizing their own regional survival. This lack of diplomatic unity prevented a collective defense. The British exploited these fissures through clever treaties and subsidiary alliances, ensuring that the Maratha houses were militarily neutralized one by one.
See lessThe rise of powerful Maratha houses like Scindia and Holkar indicates that the confederacy— (A) Strengthened imperial unity (B) Encouraged regional militarization (C) Prevented British expansion (D) Reduced revenue extraction
The Maratha Confederacy functioned as a system of decentralized military power. As families like the Scindias and Holkars gained "Saranjams" (land grants), they invested heavily in their own military infrastructure. They hired French and British mercenaries to train elite infantry and established inRead more
The Maratha Confederacy functioned as a system of decentralized military power. As families like the Scindias and Holkars gained “Saranjams” (land grants), they invested heavily in their own military infrastructure. They hired French and British mercenaries to train elite infantry and established independent weapons foundries. This regional militarization made the empire territorially massive but politically fragile. While it allowed for rapid expansion, it shifted the focus of power from the central authority in Pune to the individual military camps of the sardars, leading to internal competition for resources.
See less