What are the two different views prevailing in the mankind regarding the inevitable end of the world?

View 1: End of World by Fire

According to the poem, the end of the world could be caused by fire.

The speaker suggests that desire or passion (represented by fire) could lead to the destruction of the world.

This view implies that humans have the power to destroy the world with their reckless actions.

Fire is often associated with destruction and chaos, which suggests that the end of the world by fire would be a violent and catastrophic event.

This view highlights the dangers of uncontrolled human behavior and the need for self-control and responsibility.

View 2: End of World by Ice

The poem also suggests that the end of the world could be caused by ice.

The speaker argues that hatred or indifference (represented by ice) could lead to the end of the world.

This view implies that humans have the power to destroy the world not only through their actions but also through their lack of action or emotion.

Ice is often associated with coldness and emptiness, which suggests that the end of the world by ice would be a slow and gradual process.

This view highlights the dangers of apathy and the need for empathy and compassion.

Conclusion

The poem Fire and Ice presents two different views about the end of the world.

One view suggests that the end of the world could be caused by the destructive power of desire and passion (fire).

The other view suggests that the end of the world could be caused by the destructive power of hatred and indifference (ice).

Both views highlight the dangers of human behavior and the need for self-control, responsibility, empathy, and compassion.