Re-read excerpts from the judgment on the Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation case. Now write in your own words what the judges meant when they said that the Right to Livelihood was part of the Right to Life.

In the Olga Tellis vs Bombay Municipal Corporation case, the judges implied that the Right to Livelihood is a part of the Right to Life by:
1. Interpreting Right to Life: Stating that the Right to Life in Article 21 encompasses a dignified life beyond mere survival.
2. Emphasizing Livelihood Importance: Highlighting that denying opportunities to earn a living violates an individual’s right to live with dignity.
3. Integral Component: Asserting that the right to earn a livelihood is fundamental for a decent life, making it an intrinsic part of the broader Right to Life guaranteed by the Constitution.