Unfair advantage through money: Wealthy candidates can spend large sums on election campaigns, advertisements and voter incentives, overshadowing candidates with fewer resources.

Influence on voters: Large expenditures may persuade voters to support candidates for material benefits rather than policies or competence, undermining informed choice.

Muscle power and intimidation: Some candidates use threats, violence, or coercion to influence voters or rival candidates, creating fear and restricting free participation.

Erosion of public trust: When elections are dominated by money and muscle, citizens lose faith in the democratic process, believing that power depends on wealth or force, not merit.

Impact on governance: Such practices reduce accountability, limit genuine political competition and weaken democracy, as true representation is compromised.

These points show why democracy suffers when money and muscle dominate elections.