How did Jyotirao, and other reformer justify their criticism of caste inequality in society?

Justifications of Caste Inequality Criticism by Reformers:

1. Human Equality Principle: Emphasized the fundamental equality of all individuals, regardless of caste, asserting equal rights and opportunities for everyone.

2. Ethical Standpoint: Criticized caste discrimination on ethical grounds, citing moral principles of justice, compassion, and humanity.

3. Scriptural Analysis: Highlighted contradictions within religious texts to challenge the basis of caste discrimination, focusing on more egalitarian aspects of scriptures.

4. Social Harmony: Argued that caste-based discrimination disrupts social unity and impedes societal progress, advocating for cohesion and cooperation among all segments of society.

5. Education for Empowerment: Emphasized education as a catalyst for social change, empowering individuals from lower castes to challenge and break the chains of oppression.

6. Utility of Equality: Stressed the societal benefits of equal opportunities, asserting that a society with equitable rights and resources would foster collective progress.

Through moral, ethical, and pragmatic arguments rooted in principles of equality and justice, reformers justified their critique of caste inequality, striving to create a more equitable and harmonious society.