Give arguments to support or oppose the following assertion Government in poor countries should spend less on poverty reduction, health, education and spend more on industries and infrastructure.

Supporting: Advocates argue that prioritizing industries and infrastructure over social spending accelerates economic growth, attracting investments and creating job opportunities, potentially aiding poverty reduction in the long term.

Opposing: Opponents highlight that investing in health, education, and poverty reduction directly benefits vulnerable populations, fostering social stability and human capital crucial for sustainable economic growth. Balancing infrastructure development with social spending ensures inclusive growth and long-term prosperity for all citizens.