Letter from Tribals to NHRC • Government’s proposal is a violation of human rights. • It is taking away their right to live, right to follow their beliefs. • For centuries the forests have been their means of livelihood. • They have practised their rituals here. • No alternative has been suggested tRead more
Letter from Tribals to NHRC
• Government’s proposal is a violation of human rights.
• It is taking away their right to live, right to follow their beliefs.
• For centuries the forests have been their means of livelihood.
• They have practised their rituals here.
• No alternative has been suggested to them.
• Nothing has happened to the wildlife, so why this sudden interest?
• Displacement would cause untold misery to them, their families, children and their future.
Response from the Government
• The government had given a warning to the people two years ago.
• There has been an alarming rise in poaching, cutting of trees and killing of wildlife.
• Environmental pollution has also increased.
• It is the government’s duty to protect the endangered species.
• The government has offered compensation and promised rehabilitation in alternative places.
• Offered jobs to the men.
NHRC’s Report
• Both sides have a point.
• The Tribals have tradition, practice and decades of residence behind them. It is their world and life.
• Sudden uprooting will leave them emotionally disturbed, turn them into vagabonds and force them into jobs or occupations which they have never followed.
• The Government is right in its concern for wildlife. It is its duty to save certain species from becoming extinct. Poachers are having a field day, and every day the environment is threatened.
Suggestions: Transfer should be slow, not sudden. First, shelter and occupation should be provided to all the people. Education should be the primary concern. Only through education can the younger generation take to the new environment and occupation. Not one family should be rendered homeless and without means of occupation.
There is no law which states that a woman can own property in her married name only. The constitution gives equal right to both men and women. So if Madhurima wants to give her maiden name, though married, she has the right to do so. The Registrar is being traditional. For more answers visit to websRead more
There is no law which states that a woman can own property in her married name only. The constitution gives equal right to both men and women. So if Madhurima wants to give her maiden name, though married, she has the right to do so. The Registrar is being traditional.
The following rights are being violated. • Right to Equality: Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. No one can be denied admissions on grounds of birth. The person is practicing “untouchability” in an indirect way, and this is an offence in the eyes of law. His right to opportunity is also beingRead more
The following rights are being violated.
• Right to Equality: Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. No one can be denied admissions on grounds of birth. The person is practicing “untouchability” in an indirect way, and this is an offence in the eyes of law. His right to opportunity is also being violated.
• Right to Freedom: Manoj has a right to apply for any job anywhere as long as he is citizen of country.
These two points should be pointed out in your letter to the District Collector.
(a) Every country that is a democracy gives rights to its citizens For more answers visit to website: https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/social-science/
(a) Every country that is a democracy gives rights to its citizens
Thousands of tribals and other forest dwellers gathered at Piparia in Hoshangabad district in Madhya Pradesh to protest against their proposed displacement from the Satpura National Park, Bori Wildlife Sanctuary and Panchmarhi Wildlife Sanctuary. They argue that such a displacement is an attack on their livelihood and beliefs. Government claims that their displacement is essential for the development of the area and for protection of wildlife. Write a petition on behalf of the forest dwellers to the NHRC, a response from the government and a report of the NHRC on this matter.
Letter from Tribals to NHRC • Government’s proposal is a violation of human rights. • It is taking away their right to live, right to follow their beliefs. • For centuries the forests have been their means of livelihood. • They have practised their rituals here. • No alternative has been suggested tRead more
Letter from Tribals to NHRC
• Government’s proposal is a violation of human rights.
• It is taking away their right to live, right to follow their beliefs.
• For centuries the forests have been their means of livelihood.
• They have practised their rituals here.
• No alternative has been suggested to them.
• Nothing has happened to the wildlife, so why this sudden interest?
• Displacement would cause untold misery to them, their families, children and their future.
Response from the Government
• The government had given a warning to the people two years ago.
• There has been an alarming rise in poaching, cutting of trees and killing of wildlife.
• Environmental pollution has also increased.
• It is the government’s duty to protect the endangered species.
• The government has offered compensation and promised rehabilitation in alternative places.
• Offered jobs to the men.
NHRC’s Report
• Both sides have a point.
• The Tribals have tradition, practice and decades of residence behind them. It is their world and life.
• Sudden uprooting will leave them emotionally disturbed, turn them into vagabonds and force them into jobs or occupations which they have never followed.
• The Government is right in its concern for wildlife. It is its duty to save certain species from becoming extinct. Poachers are having a field day, and every day the environment is threatened.
Suggestions: Transfer should be slow, not sudden. First, shelter and occupation should be provided to all the people. Education should be the primary concern. Only through education can the younger generation take to the new environment and occupation. Not one family should be rendered homeless and without means of occupation.
For more answers visit to website:
See lesshttps://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/social-science/
When Madhurima went to the property registration office, the exercises Registrar told her, “You can’t write your name as Madhurima Banerjee d/o A. K. Banerjee. You are married, so you must give your husband’s name. Your husband’s surname is Rao. So your name should be changed to Madhurima Rao.” She did not agree. She said “If my husband’s name has not changed after marriage, why should mine?” In your opinion who is right in this dispute? And why?
There is no law which states that a woman can own property in her married name only. The constitution gives equal right to both men and women. So if Madhurima wants to give her maiden name, though married, she has the right to do so. The Registrar is being traditional. For more answers visit to websRead more
There is no law which states that a woman can own property in her married name only. The constitution gives equal right to both men and women. So if Madhurima wants to give her maiden name, though married, she has the right to do so. The Registrar is being traditional.
For more answers visit to website:
See lesshttps://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/social-science/
Manoj went to a college to apply for admission into an MBA course. The clerk refused to take his application and said “You, the son of a sweeper, wish to be a manager! Has anyone done this job in your community? Go to the municipality office and apply for a sweeper’s position”. Which of Manoj’s fundamental rights are being violated in this instance? Spell these out in a letter from Manoj to the district collector.
The following rights are being violated. • Right to Equality: Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. No one can be denied admissions on grounds of birth. The person is practicing “untouchability” in an indirect way, and this is an offence in the eyes of law. His right to opportunity is also beingRead more
The following rights are being violated.
• Right to Equality: Everyone is equal in the eyes of the law. No one can be denied admissions on grounds of birth. The person is practicing “untouchability” in an indirect way, and this is an offence in the eyes of law. His right to opportunity is also being violated.
• Right to Freedom: Manoj has a right to apply for any job anywhere as long as he is citizen of country.
These two points should be pointed out in your letter to the District Collector.
For more answers visit to website:
See lesshttps://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/social-science/
Which of these statements about the relationship between democracy and rights is more valid? Give reasons for your preference.
(a) Every country that is a democracy gives rights to its citizens For more answers visit to website: https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/social-science/
(a) Every country that is a democracy gives rights to its citizens
For more answers visit to website:
See lesshttps://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/social-science/
Which of the following rights is available under the Indian Constitution?
(c) Right to protect one’s culture For more answers visit to website: https://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/social-science/
(c) Right to protect one’s culture
For more answers visit to website:
See lesshttps://www.tiwariacademy.com/ncert-solutions/class-9/social-science/