Share & grow the world's knowledge!
We want to connect the people who have knowledge to the people who need it, to bring together people with different perspectives so they can understand each other better, and to empower everyone to share their knowledge.
Which Sultanate source gives the most detailed account of the administrative failures of Muhammad bin Tughlaq?
Ziauddin Barani’s Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi is considered the most authoritative contemporary source describing Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s reign. Barani lived during that period and observed many of the Sultan’s experiments. He criticized Tughlaq for excessive idealism, poor planning and impractical reformsRead more
Ziauddin Barani’s Tarikh-i-Firoz Shahi is considered the most authoritative contemporary source describing Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s reign. Barani lived during that period and observed many of the Sultan’s experiments. He criticized Tughlaq for excessive idealism, poor planning and impractical reforms such as the introduction of token currency, shifting the capital and enforcing harsh revenue assessments. His writing provides detailed descriptions of administrative chaos, rebellions and economic decline. Although Barani had personal biases, his chronicle remains the primary historical reference for understanding the complex and controversial rule of Muhammad bin Tughlaq.
See lessWhich Sultan reversed Alauddin Khalji’s agrarian reforms and restored land to hereditary owners (Khuts, Muqaddams)?
Alauddin Khalji had confiscated lands from hereditary village leaders such as khuts and muqaddams to weaken their economic influence. Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq reversed this policy. He returned lands and privileges to these groups, arguing that mild governance, not strict control, promotes loyalty and betRead more
Alauddin Khalji had confiscated lands from hereditary village leaders such as khuts and muqaddams to weaken their economic influence. Ghiyasuddin Tughlaq reversed this policy. He returned lands and privileges to these groups, arguing that mild governance, not strict control, promotes loyalty and better tax compliance. His approach was conciliatory, aiming to gain the cooperation of rural elites. While this improved relations and eased tensions in the countryside, it also weakened the centralized authority that Alauddin had built. Ghiyasuddin’s policies reflect a shift from harsh centralization to a more balanced and pragmatic rural administration.
See lessThe establishment of the Diwan-e-Mustakhraj by the Tughlaqs was primarily meant to—
The Tughlaq administration faced severe financial strain due to inefficient revenue collection and large arrears. To address this crisis, Diwan-e-Mustakhraj was created as a specialized department responsible for recovering overdue revenue from villages, zamindars and corrupt officials. It investigaRead more
The Tughlaq administration faced severe financial strain due to inefficient revenue collection and large arrears. To address this crisis, Diwan-e-Mustakhraj was created as a specialized department responsible for recovering overdue revenue from villages, zamindars and corrupt officials. It investigated fraudulent assessments, forced recovery where needed and monitored local officers. This department strengthened the fiscal structure during a time when the empire struggled with rebellion, mismanagement and administrative weakness. Recovering arrears reduced the financial burden on the central treasury and helped maintain state functions. It reflects the Sultanate’s attempt to implement systematic, corrective financial reforms during challenging times.
See lessThe experiment of shifting the capital from Delhi to Devagiri reflects Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s objective to—
The decision to shift the capital from Delhi to Devagiri reflected Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s ambition to expand and consolidate his authority in South India. The Sultanate had recently gained control over major Deccan regions and Devagiri lay at a geographically central point between North India and thRead more
The decision to shift the capital from Delhi to Devagiri reflected Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s ambition to expand and consolidate his authority in South India. The Sultanate had recently gained control over major Deccan regions and Devagiri lay at a geographically central point between North India and the southern provinces. Muhammad bin Tughlaq believed that relocating the capital would improve communication, strengthen political control and support his larger vision of ruling a unified subcontinent. However, the plan was poorly executed, causing massive displacement, public suffering and financial loss. Ultimately, Devagiri was abandoned as the capital, proving the experiment an administrative failure.
See lessWhich Sultan formally abolished the practice of Dagh (branding of horses) and Chehra (descriptive rolls of soldiers), leading to major administrative disorder?
The practices of Dagh and Chehra introduced by Alauddin Khalji had ensured strong military discipline by preventing soldiers from submitting inferior horses or false identities. When Muhammad bin Tughlaq came to power, he abolished these measures in an attempt to appear generous and trusting towardRead more
The practices of Dagh and Chehra introduced by Alauddin Khalji had ensured strong military discipline by preventing soldiers from submitting inferior horses or false identities. When Muhammad bin Tughlaq came to power, he abolished these measures in an attempt to appear generous and trusting toward his troops. However, this decision backfired badly. Without proper documentation or horse verification, corruption spread rapidly within the army. Soldiers replaced branded horses with weak ones, fake troop numbers increased and military efficiency collapsed. Contemporary chroniclers like Barani clearly note that Muhammad bin Tughlaq’s withdrawal of these reforms caused significant administrative and military disorder.
See less