In what way was the administration of the Company different from that of Indian rulers?

Differences in Administration:
1. Centralization vs. Decentralization: The Company’s administration was centralized, directed from London, while Indian rulers often had decentralized systems with power delegated to local authorities.

2. Legal Systems: The Company introduced a uniform legal system based on English law, while Indian rulers followed diverse customary laws and local traditions.

3. Revenue Collection: The Company implemented systematic revenue collection for economic gain, contrasting with Indian rulers who collected revenue based on traditional agrarian systems.

4. Education and Governance: Company emphasized Western education and modern governance methods, unlike Indian rulers who focused on traditional education and local administrative structures.

5. Military Structure: The Company established a disciplined, modern military force, differing from Indian rulers who had diverse military systems and traditional warfare methods.

6. Social Reforms: Company introduced social reforms like abolition of sati and promoting widow remarriage, while Indian rulers often followed traditional social customs.

These differences highlight contrasting approaches to governance, law, revenue, education, military, and social reforms between the Company and Indian rulers.